Which candidates did Association Nea Advocacy Fund's money end up backing or attacking in 2020?

against Thom Tilllis (North Carolina Senate, about $1.4M, lost); against John James (Michigan Senate, about $826K, won); for Joyce Elliott (Arkansas 2nd District, about $223K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

Association Nea Advocacy Fund

Individual

Not Applicable, Nea · DC

4 reported gifts; 1 recipient group listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Backed losers

Association Nea Advocacy Fund gave $14M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2020 federal elections, and 99% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2020). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 33% were on the winning side ($982K won, $2.0M lost). $172K had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$14M

99% of it helped Democrats

Winning share of scored dollars

33%

$3.0M scored (21% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$2.0M

Not allocated or result unknown

$11M

$11M not allocated to tracked outside spending; $172K has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

A person writing checks from their own fortune. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Result not matched

Group	Gave	How the group spent it	Won / lost
Nea Advocacy Fund $11M not allocated to tracked outside spending	$14M		$982K / $2.0M

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Association Nea Advocacy Fund's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Association Nea Advocacy Fund's share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
Thom Tilllis	North Carolina Senate	Attacking	$1.4M	✗ No
John James	Michigan Senate	Attacking	$826K	✓ Yes
Joyce Elliott	Arkansas 2nd District	Supporting	$223K	✗ No
Andrew R. Garbarino	New York 2nd District	Attacking	$189K	✗ No
Yvette Harrell	New Mexico 2nd District	Attacking	$172K	Unknown
Karen Handel	Georgia 6th District	Attacking	$71K	✓ Yes
Mariannette Miller-Meeks	Iowa 2nd District	Attacking	$54K	✗ No
Jackie Gordon	New York 2nd District	Supporting	$47K	✗ No
Donald Trump	President	Attacking	$35K	✓ Yes
Joe Biden	President	Supporting	$32K	✓ Yes
Rita R. Hart	Iowa 2nd District	Supporting	$23K	✗ No
Karen Handel	Georgia 6th District	Supporting	$18K	✗ No

Individual as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Association Nea Advocacy Fund spend on the 2020 elections, and did it win?: Association Nea Advocacy Fund gave $14M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2020 federal elections, and 99% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2020). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 33% were on the winning side ($982K won, $2.0M lost). $172K had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Association Nea Advocacy Fund fund in 2020?: Nea Advocacy Fund ($14M).
Which candidates did Association Nea Advocacy Fund's money end up backing or attacking in 2020?: against Thom Tilllis (North Carolina Senate, about $1.4M, lost); against John James (Michigan Senate, about $826K, won); for Joyce Elliott (Arkansas 2nd District, about $223K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.