Which super PACs did Defeat By Tweet fund in 2020?

Wfp Ie Committee ($285K), Mijente PAC ($142K), Care in Action PAC ($142K), Colorofchange PAC ($142K), Asian American Advocacy Fund PAC ($134K).

Which candidates did Defeat By Tweet's money end up backing or attacking in 2020?

for Raphael Warnock (Georgia Senate (special), about $219K, won); for Joe Biden (President, about $64K, won); for Jon Ossoff (Georgia Senate, about $63K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

Defeat By Tweet

Another PAC

New York

27 reported gifts; 5 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Backed winners

Defeat By Tweet gave $846K to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2020 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2020). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 97% were on the winning side ($389K won, $13K lost). $6K had no matched result and is excluded.

$846K

Gave to outside spenders

100% of it helped Democrats

97%

Winning share of scored dollars

$401K scored (47% of gifts)

$13K

Spent on the losing side

$444K

Not allocated or result unknown

$438K not allocated to tracked outside spending; $6K has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

Another political committee passing money along. The original donor is one step upstream. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Result not matched

Group	Gave	Won / lost
Wfp Ie Committee $163K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$285K	$103K / $12K
Mijente PAC $59K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$142K	$83K / $18
Care in Action PAC $21K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$142K	$121K / $0
Colorofchange PAC $121K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$142K	$22K / $169
Asian American Advocacy Fund PAC $75K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$134K	$59K / $0

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Defeat By Tweet's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Defeat By Tweet's share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
Raphael Warnock	Georgia Senate (special)	Supporting	$219K	✓ Yes
Joe Biden	President	Supporting	$64K	✓ Yes
Jon Ossoff	Georgia Senate	Supporting	$63K	✓ Yes
Donald Trump	President	Attacking	$20K	✓ Yes
Jamaal Bowman	New York 16th District (primary)	Supporting	$14K	✓ Yes
Jessica Cisneros	Texas 28th District (primary)	Supporting	$4K	Unknown
Kara Eastman	Nebraska 2nd District	Supporting	$4K	✗ No
Rosa L. DeLauro	Connecticut 3rd District	Supporting	$3K	✓ Yes
Rashida Tlaib	Michigan 13th District (primary)	Supporting	$2K	✓ Yes
Ammar Campa-Najjar	California 50th District	Supporting	$2K	✗ No
Ilhan Omar	Minnesota 5th District (primary)	Supporting	$2K	✓ Yes
Jessica Scarane	Delaware Senate (primary)	Supporting	$2K	Unknown

Another PAC as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Defeat By Tweet spend on the 2020 elections, and did it win?: Defeat By Tweet gave $846K to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2020 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2020). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 97% were on the winning side ($389K won, $13K lost). $6K had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Defeat By Tweet fund in 2020?: Wfp Ie Committee ($285K), Mijente PAC ($142K), Care in Action PAC ($142K), Colorofchange PAC ($142K), Asian American Advocacy Fund PAC ($134K).
Which candidates did Defeat By Tweet's money end up backing or attacking in 2020?: for Raphael Warnock (Georgia Senate (special), about $219K, won); for Joe Biden (President, about $64K, won); for Jon Ossoff (Georgia Senate, about $63K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.