← All donors

Donor

House Majority Forward

Dark money

DC

7 gifts to 1 group, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Loser

House Majority Forward gave $8.0M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2020 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings through Dec 31, 2020). Counting dollars, not candidates, and only races already called, 18% ended up on the winning side ($1.4M won, $6.1M lost).

Nonprofit arm of House Majority PAC. It does not disclose its donors.

Gave to outside spenders

$8.0M

100% of it helped Democrats

Ended up on the winning side

18%

$1.4M of the dollars in races already called

Spent on the losing side

$6.1M

Not spent yet

$485K

Sitting with groups that have not spent

Where the trail ends

What the IRS sees

House Majority Forward is a 501(c)(4) social welfare group based in Washington, DC. It files a Form 990 with the IRS every year that shows how much money it moves, but never who gave it. That is the whole point of routing money this way.
IRS filings on ProPublica →

Revenue, 2023

$22M

from donors it does not have to name

Spent, 2023

$19M

Assets at year end, 2023

$8.8M

Tax yearRevenueSpentAssetsFiling
2023$22M$19M$8.8M990 PDF
2022$25M$24M$5.3M990 PDF
2021$12M$12M$4.1M990 PDF
2020$30M$27M$3.8M990 PDF
2019$8.3M$7.1M$1.2Me-file
2024filed, not yet digitised990 PDF

The $8.0M it gave to super PACs in 2020 is 36% of what it took in during 2023, its latest year on file. The 990 lists what it spent on politics in a single line and leaves every donor blank.

House Majority Forward also bought $22K of Google and YouTube ads under its own name this cycle. All ad buyers →

Where the cheques went

A nonprofit that does not have to say where its own money came from. The trail ends here. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M cheque to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.
✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Result not matched
GroupGaveHow the group spent itWon / lost
House Majority PAC

$460K not spent yet

$8.0M
$1.4M / $6.1M

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates House Majority Forward's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by House Majority Forward's share of each group's funding.
CandidateRaceSpendingTheir sharePaid off?
Michelle SteelCalifornia 48th DistrictAttacking$403K✗ No
Jeff Van DrewNew Jersey 2nd DistrictAttacking$288K✗ No
Michelle FischbachMinnesota 7th DistrictAttacking$256K✗ No
Mike GarciaCalifornia 25th DistrictAttacking$251K✗ No
Nicole MalliotakisNew York 11th DistrictAttacking$237K✗ No
Troy NehlsTexas 22nd DistrictAttacking$234K✗ No
Burgess OwensUtah 4th DistrictAttacking$224K✗ No
Mariannette Miller-MeeksIowa 2nd DistrictAttacking$197K✗ No
Rich McCormickGeorgia 7th DistrictAttacking$190K✓ Yes
Rodney DavisIllinois 13th DistrictAttacking$186K✗ No
Max N. RoseNew York 11th DistrictSupporting$181K✗ No
Carlos GimenezFlorida 26th DistrictAttacking$179K✗ No

Dark money as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did House Majority Forward spend on the 2020 elections, and did it win?
House Majority Forward gave $8.0M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2020 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings through Dec 31, 2020). Counting dollars, not candidates, and only races already called, 18% ended up on the winning side ($1.4M won, $6.1M lost).
Which super PACs did House Majority Forward fund in 2020?
House Majority PAC ($8.0M).
Which candidates did House Majority Forward's money end up backing or attacking in 2020?
against Michelle Steel (California 48th District, about $403K, lost); against Jeff Van Drew (New Jersey 2nd District, about $288K, lost); against Michelle Fischbach (Minnesota 7th District, about $256K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.