← All donors

Donor

Majority Forward

Dark money

DC

22 gifts to 5 groups, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Mixed

Majority Forward gave $61M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2020 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings through Dec 31, 2020). 37% of the money with a result ended up on the winning side ($20M won, $34M lost).

Nonprofit arm of Senate Majority PAC. It does not disclose its donors.

Gave to outside spenders

$61M

100% of it helped Democrats

Ended up on the winning side

37%

$20M

Spent on the losing side

$34M

Not spent yet

$6.5M

Sitting with groups that have not spent

Where the trail ends

What the IRS sees

Majority Forward is a 501(c)(4) social welfare group based in Washington, DC. It files a Form 990 with the IRS every year that shows how much money it moves, but never who gave it. That is the whole point of routing money this way.
IRS filings on ProPublica →

Revenue, 2018

$28M

from donors it does not have to name

Spent, 2018

$9.7M

Assets at year end, 2018

$20M

Tax yearRevenueSpentAssetsFiling
2018$28M$9.7M$20M990 PDF
2019filed, not yet digitised990 PDF

The $61M it gave to super PACs in 2020 is 219% of what it took in during 2018, its latest year on file. The 990 lists what it spent on politics in a single line and leaves every donor blank.

Majority Forward also bought $689K of Google and YouTube ads under its own name this cycle. All ad buyers →

Where the cheques went

A nonprofit that does not have to say where its own money came from. The trail ends here. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M cheque to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.
✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Result not matched
GroupGaveHow the group spent itWon / lost
Senate Majority PAC

No outside spending reported yet

$51M
$19M / $27M
North Star

No outside spending reported yet

$7.1M
$0 / $6.9M
The Lincoln Project

No outside spending reported yet

$1.4M
$900K / $325K
Our Future United

No outside spending reported yet

$653K
$109K / $352K
Piedmont Rising

No outside spending reported yet

$140K
$0 / $32K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Majority Forward's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Majority Forward's share of each group's funding.
CandidateRaceSpendingTheir sharePaid off?
Dan SullivanAlaska SenateAttacking$6.9M✗ No
Thom TilllisNorth Carolina SenateAttacking$6.8M✗ No
John JamesMichigan Senate (primary)Attacking$6.8M✗ No
Joni ErnstIowa SenateAttacking$6.7M✗ No
David A. PerdueGeorgia SenateAttacking$6.2M✓ Yes
Susan Margaret CollinsMaine SenateAttacking$5.5M✗ No
Steve DainesMontana SenateAttacking$3.3M✗ No
Martha McSallyArizona SenateAttacking$2.9M✓ Yes
John CornynTexas SenateAttacking$1.7M✗ No
Theresa GreenfieldIowa Senate (primary)Supporting$1.6M✓ Yes
Cory GardnerColorado SenateAttacking$1.5M✓ Yes
Lindsey GrahamSouth Carolina SenateAttacking$1.0M✗ No

Dark money as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Majority Forward spend on the 2020 elections, and did it win?
Majority Forward gave $61M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2020 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings through Dec 31, 2020). 37% of the money with a result ended up on the winning side ($20M won, $34M lost).
Which super PACs did Majority Forward fund in 2020?
Senate Majority PAC ($51M), North Star ($7.1M), The Lincoln Project ($1.4M), Our Future United ($653K), Piedmont Rising ($140K).
Which candidates did Majority Forward's money end up backing or attacking in 2020?
against Dan Sullivan (Alaska Senate, about $6.9M, lost); against Thom Tilllis (North Carolina Senate, about $6.8M, lost); against John James (Michigan Senate, about $6.8M, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.