Which super PACs did Trevor Rees-Jones fund in 2022?

Senate Leadership Fund ($1.3M), Congressional Leadership Fund ($375K), American Leadership Action ($125K), Alabama Conservatives Fund ($100K), Carolina Senate Fund ($100K).

Which candidates did Trevor Rees-Jones's money end up backing or attacking in 2022?

against John K. Fetterman (Pennsylvania Senate, about $290K, lost); against Raphael Warnock (Georgia Senate, about $231K, lost); against Cheri Beasley (North Carolina Senate, about $167K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

Trevor Rees-Jones

Individual

Owner & CEO, Chief Oil & Gas LLC · Texas

14 gifts to 9 groups, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Mixed

Trevor Rees-Jones gave $2.3M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2022 federal elections, and 88% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings through Dec 31, 2022). Counting dollars, not candidates, and only races already called, 40% ended up on the winning side ($751K won, $1.1M lost).

Gave to outside spenders

$2.3M

88% of it helped Republicans

Ended up on the winning side

40%

$751K of the dollars in races already called

Spent on the losing side

$1.1M

Not spent yet

$357K

Sitting with groups that have not spent

Where the cheques went

A person writing cheques from their own fortune. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M cheque to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Result not matched

Group	Gave	Won / lost
Senate Leadership Fund $178K not spent yet	$1.3M	$448K / $624K
Congressional Leadership Fund $42K not spent yet	$375K	$126K / $201K
American Leadership Action $14K not spent yet	$125K	$28K / $84K
Alabama Conservatives Fund $14K not spent yet	$100K	$86K / $0
Carolina Senate Fund $14K not spent yet	$100K	$0 / $65K
Honor Pennsylvania $7K not spent yet	$100K	$3K / $71K
Club for Growth Action $17K not spent yet	$100K	$39K / $38K
Saving Arizona PAC $10K not spent yet	$50K	$19K / $21K
34n22, Inc. $11K not spent yet	$50K	$1K / $38K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Trevor Rees-Jones's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Trevor Rees-Jones's share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
John K. Fetterman	Pennsylvania Senate	Attacking	$290K	✗ No
Raphael Warnock	Georgia Senate	Attacking	$231K	✗ No
Cheri Beasley	North Carolina Senate	Attacking	$167K	✓ Yes
Tim Ryan	Ohio Senate	Attacking	$142K	✓ Yes
Catherine Cortez Masto	Nevada Senate	Attacking	$126K	✗ No
Mandela Barnes	Wisconsin Senate	Attacking	$114K	✓ Yes
Katie Britt	Alabama Senate (primary)	Supporting	$86K	✓ Yes
Mehmet Oz	Pennsylvania Senate (primary)	Attacking	$71K	✗ No
Ted Budd	North Carolina Senate (primary)	Attacking	$65K	✗ No
Herschel Junior Walker	Georgia Senate	Supporting	$43K	✗ No
Donald C. Bolduc	New Hampshire Senate	Supporting	$40K	✗ No
Maggie Hassan	New Hampshire Senate	Attacking	$29K	✗ No

Individual as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Trevor Rees-Jones spend on the 2022 elections, and did it win?: Trevor Rees-Jones gave $2.3M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2022 federal elections, and 88% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings through Dec 31, 2022). Counting dollars, not candidates, and only races already called, 40% ended up on the winning side ($751K won, $1.1M lost).
Which super PACs did Trevor Rees-Jones fund in 2022?: Senate Leadership Fund ($1.3M), Congressional Leadership Fund ($375K), American Leadership Action ($125K), Alabama Conservatives Fund ($100K), Carolina Senate Fund ($100K).
Which candidates did Trevor Rees-Jones's money end up backing or attacking in 2022?: against John K. Fetterman (Pennsylvania Senate, about $290K, lost); against Raphael Warnock (Georgia Senate, about $231K, lost); against Cheri Beasley (North Carolina Senate, about $167K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.