← All donors

Donor

Nea Advocacy Fund

Another PAC

DC

11 reported gifts; 6 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Backed winners

Nea Advocacy Fund gave $4.8M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2022 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2022). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 78% were on the winning side ($2.2M won, $608K lost). $35K had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$4.8M

100% of it helped Democrats

Winning share of scored dollars

78%

$2.8M scored (59% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$608K

Not allocated or result unknown

$2.0M

$1.9M not allocated to tracked outside spending; $35K has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

Another political committee passing money along. The original donor is one step upstream. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.
✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Result not matched
GroupGaveHow the group spent itWon / lost
House Majority PAC

$428K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$2.1M
$1.3M / $368K
Senate Majority PAC

$947K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$1.8M
$635K / $202K
Workers Vote

$387K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$450K
$63K / $127
Black PAC

$111K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$200K
$85K / $3K
Family Friendly Action PAC

$31K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$100K
$49K / $20K
Women Vote!

$14K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$100K
$65K / $16K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Nea Advocacy Fund's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Nea Advocacy Fund's share of each group's funding.
CandidateRaceSpendingTheir sharePaid off?
Mehmet OzPennsylvania SenateAttacking$227K✓ Yes
Adam Paul LaxaltNevada SenateAttacking$139K✓ Yes
Blake MastersArizona SenateAttacking$133K✓ Yes
Ron JohnsonWisconsin SenateAttacking$114K✗ No
Raphael WarnockGeorgia SenateSupporting$99K✓ Yes
John K. FettermanPennsylvania SenateSupporting$95K✓ Yes
Ted BuddNorth Carolina SenateAttacking$68K✗ No
Mark RobertsonNevada 1st DistrictAttacking$63K✓ Yes
Cassy GarciaTexas 28th DistrictAttacking$55K✓ Yes
Yesli I. VegaVirginia 7th DistrictAttacking$54K✓ Yes
Catherine Cortez MastoNevada SenateSupporting$54K✓ Yes
Karoline LeavittNew Hampshire 1st DistrictAttacking$53K✓ Yes

Another PAC as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Nea Advocacy Fund spend on the 2022 elections, and did it win?
Nea Advocacy Fund gave $4.8M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2022 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2022). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 78% were on the winning side ($2.2M won, $608K lost). $35K had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Nea Advocacy Fund fund in 2022?
House Majority PAC ($2.1M), Senate Majority PAC ($1.8M), Workers Vote ($450K), Black PAC ($200K), Family Friendly Action PAC ($100K).
Which candidates did Nea Advocacy Fund's money end up backing or attacking in 2022?
against Mehmet Oz (Pennsylvania Senate, about $227K, won); against Adam Paul Laxalt (Nevada Senate, about $139K, won); against Blake Masters (Arizona Senate, about $133K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.