Donor
Honeywell International Political Action Committee
Another PACDC
3 gifts to 3 groups, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.
Honeywell International Political Action Committee gave $650K to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2022 federal elections, and 76% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings through Dec 31, 2022). Counting dollars, not candidates, and only races already called, 46% ended up on the winning side ($263K won, $310K lost).
Gave to outside spenders
$650K
76% of it helped Republicans
Ended up on the winning side
46%
$263K of the dollars in races already called
Spent on the losing side
$310K
Not spent yet
$78K
Sitting with groups that have not spent
Where the cheques went
Another political committee passing money along. The original donor is one step upstream. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M cheque to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.
✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Result not matched
| Group | Gave | How the group spent it | Won / lost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Senate Leadership Fund $36K not spent yet | $250K | $90K / $125K | |
| Congressional Leadership Fund $28K not spent yet | $250K | $84K / $134K | |
| Center Forward Committee | $150K | $89K / $51K |
The trail
What the money bought
The candidates Honeywell International Political Action Committee's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Honeywell International Political Action Committee's share of each group's funding.
| Candidate | Race | Spending | Their share | Paid off? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| John K. Fetterman | Pennsylvania Senate | Attacking | $41K | ✗ No |
| Raphael Warnock | Georgia Senate | Attacking | $39K | ✗ No |
| Cheri Beasley | North Carolina Senate | Attacking | $33K | ✓ Yes |
| Tim Ryan | Ohio Senate | Attacking | $28K | ✓ Yes |
| Jamie McLeod-Skinner | Oregon 5th District | Attacking | $24K | ✓ Yes |
| Mandela Barnes | Wisconsin Senate | Attacking | $23K | ✓ Yes |
| Catherine Cortez Masto | Nevada Senate | Attacking | $22K | ✗ No |
| Derrick Van Orden | Wisconsin 3rd District | Attacking | $16K | ✗ No |
| Matt Larkin | Washington 8th District | Attacking | $11K | ✓ Yes |
| Tyler Kistner | Minnesota 2nd District | Attacking | $11K | ✓ Yes |
| Kurt Schrader | Oregon 5th District (primary) | Supporting | $11K | Unknown |
| Susie Lee | Nevada 3rd District | Attacking | $11K | ✗ No |
Another PAC as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.
Questions people ask
- How much did Honeywell International Political Action Committee spend on the 2022 elections, and did it win?
- Honeywell International Political Action Committee gave $650K to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2022 federal elections, and 76% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings through Dec 31, 2022). Counting dollars, not candidates, and only races already called, 46% ended up on the winning side ($263K won, $310K lost).
- Which super PACs did Honeywell International Political Action Committee fund in 2022?
- Senate Leadership Fund ($250K), Congressional Leadership Fund ($250K), Center Forward Committee ($150K).
- Which candidates did Honeywell International Political Action Committee's money end up backing or attacking in 2022?
- against John K. Fetterman (Pennsylvania Senate, about $41K, lost); against Raphael Warnock (Georgia Senate, about $39K, lost); against Cheri Beasley (North Carolina Senate, about $33K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.