Skip to content

← All donors

Donor

Communications Workers of America Working Voices

Another PAC

DC

23 reported gifts; 7 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Mixed results

Communications Workers of America Working Voices gave $4.4M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2024 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2024). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 52% were on the winning side ($1.3M won, $1.2M lost). $58K had no matched result and is excluded.

$4.4M

Gave to outside spenders

100% of it helped Democrats

52%

Winning share of scored dollars

$2.4M scored (55% of gifts)

$1.2M

Spent on the losing side

$2.0M

Not allocated or result unknown

$1.9M not allocated to tracked outside spending; $58K has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

Another political committee passing money along. The original donor is one step upstream. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.
✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Result not matched
GroupGaveHow the group spent itWon / lost
House Majority PAC

$370K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$1.5M
$585K / $500K
In Union USA

$914K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$1.3M
$36K / $300K
Battleground New York

$165K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$1.0M
$636K / $199K
Wfp National PAC

$198K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$275K
$5K / $57K
Nebraska Railroaders for Public Safety

$140K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$200K
$0 / $58K
Priorities USA Action

$124K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$150K
$0 / $23K
Casa in Action PAC

$31K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$50K
$3K / $14K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Communications Workers of America Working Voices's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Communications Workers of America Working Voices's share of each group's funding.
CandidateRaceSpendingTheir sharePaid off?
Laura A. GillenNew York 4th DistrictSupporting$245K✓ Yes
Kamala HarrisPresidentSupporting$185K✗ No
Mondaire L. JonesNew York 17th DistrictSupporting$171K✗ No
Josh RileyNew York 19th DistrictSupporting$145K✓ Yes
Thomas R. SuozziNew York 3rd DistrictSupporting$138K✓ Yes
John W. MannionNew York 22nd DistrictSupporting$106K✓ Yes
Dan OsbornNebraska SenateSupporting$63K✗ No
Robert P. Casey Jr.Pennsylvania SenateSupporting$58K✗ No
Donald TrumpPresidentAttacking$55K✗ No
Dave McCormickPennsylvania SenateAttacking$54K✗ No
Austin TheriaultMaine 2nd DistrictAttacking$51K✓ Yes
Tom BarrettMichigan 7th DistrictAttacking$44K✗ No

Another PAC as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Communications Workers of America Working Voices spend on the 2024 elections, and did it win?
Communications Workers of America Working Voices gave $4.4M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2024 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2024). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 52% were on the winning side ($1.3M won, $1.2M lost). $58K had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Communications Workers of America Working Voices fund in 2024?
House Majority PAC ($1.5M), In Union USA ($1.3M), Battleground New York ($1.0M), Wfp National PAC ($275K), Nebraska Railroaders for Public Safety ($200K).
Which candidates did Communications Workers of America Working Voices's money end up backing or attacking in 2024?
for Laura A. Gillen (New York 4th District, about $245K, won); for Kamala Harris (President, about $185K, lost); for Mondaire L. Jones (New York 17th District, about $171K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.