Which super PACs did Evidence for Impact fund in 2024?

Future Forward (FF PAC) ($10M), Civic Truth Action ($4.3M), Voters of These 50 States of America ($2.0M), Organizing Empowerment PAC ($260K).

Which candidates did Evidence for Impact's money end up backing or attacking in 2024?

for Kamala Harris (President, about $9.1M, lost); for Chase Russell Oliver (President, about $2.2M, unknown); for Randall Terry (President, about $2.0M, unknown). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

Evidence for Impact

Company / nonprofit

6 reported gifts; 4 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Backed losers

Evidence for Impact gave $17M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2024 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2024). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 0% were on the winning side ($6K won, $9.1M lost). $4.5M had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$17M

100% of it helped Democrats

Winning share of scored dollars

$9.1M scored (54% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$9.1M

Not allocated or result unknown

$7.7M

$3.2M not allocated to tracked outside spending; $4.5M has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

A company, LLC or nonprofit. Where its money came from is not reported. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Result not matched

Group	Gave	Won / lost
Future Forward (FF PAC) $1.1M not allocated to tracked outside spending	$10M	$0 / $9.1M
Civic Truth Action $116K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$4.3M	$0 / $0
Voters of These 50 States of America $1.7M not allocated to tracked outside spending	$2.0M	$0 / $0
Organizing Empowerment PAC $182K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$260K	$6K / $72K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Evidence for Impact's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Evidence for Impact's share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
Kamala Harris	President	Supporting	$9.1M	✗ No
Chase Russell Oliver	President	Supporting	$2.2M	Unknown
Randall Terry	President	Supporting	$2.0M	Unknown
Chase Oliver	President	Supporting	$273K	Unknown
Joseph R Jr Biden	President	Supporting	$13K	Unknown
Donald Trump	President	Attacking	$11K	✗ No
Jon Tester	Montana Senate	Supporting	$7K	✗ No
Tammy Baldwin	Wisconsin Senate	Supporting	$6K	✓ Yes
Kristin Lyerly	Wisconsin 8th District	Supporting	$3K	✗ No
Joseph R Jr Biden	President (primary)	Supporting	$79	Unknown

Company / nonprofit as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Evidence for Impact spend on the 2024 elections, and did it win?: Evidence for Impact gave $17M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2024 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2024). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 0% were on the winning side ($6K won, $9.1M lost). $4.5M had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Evidence for Impact fund in 2024?: Future Forward (FF PAC) ($10M), Civic Truth Action ($4.3M), Voters of These 50 States of America ($2.0M), Organizing Empowerment PAC ($260K).
Which candidates did Evidence for Impact's money end up backing or attacking in 2024?: for Kamala Harris (President, about $9.1M, lost); for Chase Russell Oliver (President, about $2.2M, unknown); for Randall Terry (President, about $2.0M, unknown). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.