← All donors

Donor

Global Impact Social Welfare Fund

Company / nonprofit

Virginia

7 reported gifts; 5 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Backed losers

Global Impact Social Welfare Fund gave $2.3M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2024 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2024). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 14% were on the winning side ($240K won, $1.5M lost). $686 had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$2.3M

100% of it helped Democrats

Winning share of scored dollars

14%

$1.8M scored (75% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$1.5M

Not allocated or result unknown

$573K

$572K not allocated to tracked outside spending; $686 has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

A company, LLC or nonprofit. Where its money came from is not reported. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.
✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Result not matched
GroupGaveHow the group spent itWon / lost
Cffe PAC

$159K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$1.0M
$185K / $655K
Your Community PAC

$59K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$525K
$0 / $466K
One for All Committee

$112K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$500K
$46K / $342K
Forward Majority Action

$239K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$250K
$0 / $11K
Reproductive Freedom for All Freedom Fund

$3K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$50K
$9K / $38K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Global Impact Social Welfare Fund's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Global Impact Social Welfare Fund's share of each group's funding.
CandidateRaceSpendingTheir sharePaid off?
Kamala HarrisPresidentSupporting$958K✗ No
Robert P. Casey Jr.Pennsylvania SenateSupporting$159K✗ No
Jon TesterMontana SenateSupporting$118K✗ No
Elissa SlotkinMichigan SenateSupporting$98K✓ Yes
Sherrod BrownOhio SenateSupporting$94K✗ No
Carl J. MarlingaMichigan 10th DistrictSupporting$81K✗ No
Tammy BaldwinWisconsin SenateSupporting$63K✓ Yes
Nella Louise DomeniciNew Mexico SenateAttacking$55K✓ Yes
Derrick Van OrdenWisconsin 3rd DistrictAttacking$24K✗ No
Zach NunnIowa 3rd DistrictAttacking$22K✗ No
Bernard F. MorenoOhio SenateAttacking$15K✗ No
Ruben GallegoArizona SenateSupporting$12K✓ Yes

Company / nonprofit as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Global Impact Social Welfare Fund spend on the 2024 elections, and did it win?
Global Impact Social Welfare Fund gave $2.3M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2024 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Dec 31, 2024). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 14% were on the winning side ($240K won, $1.5M lost). $686 had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Global Impact Social Welfare Fund fund in 2024?
Cffe PAC ($1.0M), Your Community PAC ($525K), One for All Committee ($500K), Forward Majority Action ($250K), Reproductive Freedom for All Freedom Fund ($50K).
Which candidates did Global Impact Social Welfare Fund's money end up backing or attacking in 2024?
for Kamala Harris (President, about $958K, lost); for Robert P. Casey Jr. (Pennsylvania Senate, about $159K, lost); for Jon Tester (Montana Senate, about $118K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.