Which super PACs did American Jobs and Growth Fund fund in 2026?

Keep America Great PAC, Inc. ($8.1M), Senate Leadership Fund ($1.0M), Fund for a Working Congress ($500K).

Which candidates did American Jobs and Growth Fund's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?

against Nate Morris (Kentucky Senate, about $3.2M, unknown); for Andy Barr (Kentucky Senate, about $2.4M, won); for Andy Barr (Kentucky Senate, about $640K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

American Jobs and Growth Fund

Company / nonprofit

Virginia

20 reported gifts; 3 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Backed winners

American Jobs and Growth Fund gave $9.6M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 77% were on the winning side ($3.2M won, $945K lost, with $34K in races still being counted). $3.2M had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$9.6M

100% of it helped Republicans

Winning share of scored dollars

77%

$4.1M scored (43% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$945K

$34K still being counted

Not allocated or result unknown

$5.4M

$2.3M not allocated to tracked outside spending; $3.2M has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

A company, LLC or nonprofit. Where its money came from is not reported. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched

Group	Gave	Won / lost
Keep America Great PAC, Inc. $1.8M not allocated to tracked outside spending	$8.1M	$3.2M / $0
Senate Leadership Fund $361K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$1.0M	$24K / $581K
Fund for a Working Congress $136K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$500K	$0 / $364K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates American Jobs and Growth Fund's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by American Jobs and Growth Fund's share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
Nate Morris	Kentucky Senate (primary)	Attacking	$3.2M	Unknown
Andy Barr	Kentucky Senate (primary)	Supporting	$2.4M	✓ Yes
Andy Barr	Kentucky Senate	Supporting	$640K	✓ Yes
Josh Turek	Iowa Senate	Attacking	$225K	✗ No
Sherrod Brown	Ohio Senate (special)	Attacking	$168K	✗ No
Ashley Hinson	Iowa Senate	Supporting	$134K	✗ No
Adam Hamilton	Kansas Senate	Attacking	$107K	✗ No
Charles Booker	Kentucky Senate	Attacking	$107K	✓ Yes
Abdul El-Sayed	Michigan Senate	Attacking	$84K	✗ No
Troy Jackson	Maine Senate	Attacking	$69K	✗ No
Roy Cooper	North Carolina Senate	Attacking	$54K	✗ No
Mary Peltola	Alaska Senate	Attacking	$29K	Counting

Company / nonprofit as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did American Jobs and Growth Fund spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?: American Jobs and Growth Fund gave $9.6M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 77% were on the winning side ($3.2M won, $945K lost, with $34K in races still being counted). $3.2M had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did American Jobs and Growth Fund fund in 2026?: Keep America Great PAC, Inc. ($8.1M), Senate Leadership Fund ($1.0M), Fund for a Working Congress ($500K).
Which candidates did American Jobs and Growth Fund's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?: against Nate Morris (Kentucky Senate, about $3.2M, unknown); for Andy Barr (Kentucky Senate, about $2.4M, won); for Andy Barr (Kentucky Senate, about $640K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.