Which super PACs did Contours, Inc. fund in 2026?

Government That Works PAC ($2.9M), Progressive Vet PAC ($2.6M), Fire House PAC ($300K), Wheel Dog PAC ($300K).

Which candidates did Contours, Inc.'s money end up backing or attacking in 2026?

for Alani Bankhead (Montana Senate, about $2.2M, won); against Darline Graham (South Carolina Senate, about $269K, won); against Reilly Neill (Montana Senate, about $178K, unknown). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

Contours, Inc.

Company / nonprofit

Delaware

8 reported gifts; 4 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Backed winners

Contours, Inc. gave $6.1M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 99% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 96% were on the winning side ($3.4M won, $125K lost, with $365K in races still being counted). $351K had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$6.1M

99% of it helped Democrats

Winning share of scored dollars

96%

$3.5M scored (58% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$125K

$365K still being counted

Not allocated or result unknown

$2.2M

$1.9M not allocated to tracked outside spending; $351K has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

A company, LLC or nonprofit. Where its money came from is not reported. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched

Group	Gave	Won / lost
Government That Works PAC $1.6M not allocated to tracked outside spending	$2.9M	$1.1M / $10K
Progressive Vet PAC $238K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$2.6M	$2.2M / $0
Fire House PAC $17K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$300K	$0 / $113K
Wheel Dog PAC	$300K	$90K / $2K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Contours, Inc.'s money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Contours, Inc.'s share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
Alani Bankhead	Montana Senate (primary)	Supporting	$2.2M	✓ Yes
Darline Graham	South Carolina Senate	Attacking	$269K	✓ Yes
Reilly Neill	Montana Senate (primary)	Attacking	$178K	Unknown
Nate Powell	Washington 5th District (primary)	Supporting	$170K	Unknown
Annie Andrews	South Carolina Senate	Supporting	$167K	✓ Yes
Adam Hamilton	Kansas Senate	Supporting	$162K	✓ Yes
Josh Turek	Iowa Senate	Supporting	$135K	✓ Yes
Scott Colom	Mississippi Senate	Supporting	$125K	Counting
Roger Marshall	Kansas Senate	Attacking	$115K	✓ Yes
Bill Hill	Alaska at-large House seat	Supporting	$102K	Counting
Michael Baumgartner	Washington 5th District (primary)	Attacking	$91K	✗ No
Nick Begich III	Alaska at-large House seat	Attacking	$91K	Counting

Company / nonprofit as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Contours, Inc. spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?: Contours, Inc. gave $6.1M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 99% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 96% were on the winning side ($3.4M won, $125K lost, with $365K in races still being counted). $351K had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Contours, Inc. fund in 2026?: Government That Works PAC ($2.9M), Progressive Vet PAC ($2.6M), Fire House PAC ($300K), Wheel Dog PAC ($300K).
Which candidates did Contours, Inc.'s money end up backing or attacking in 2026?: for Alani Bankhead (Montana Senate, about $2.2M, won); against Darline Graham (South Carolina Senate, about $269K, won); against Reilly Neill (Montana Senate, about $178K, unknown). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.