Which super PACs did Energy Transfer LP fund in 2026?

MAGA Inc. ($13M), Senate Leadership Fund ($1.0M), High Plains PAC ($200K), Pine Tree Results PAC ($25K), Glcf, Inc. ($25K).

Which candidates did Energy Transfer LP's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?

against James Talarico (Texas Senate, about $850K, lost); against Abdul El-Sayed (Michigan Senate, about $651K, lost); against Sherrod Brown (Ohio Senate (special), about $601K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

Energy Transfer LP

Company

Texas

9 reported gifts; 6 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Backed losers

Energy Transfer LP gave $14M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 1% were on the winning side ($108K won, $7.2M lost, with $669K in races still being counted). $44K had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$14M

100% of it helped Republicans

Winning share of scored dollars

$7.3M scored (53% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$7.2M

$669K still being counted

Not allocated or result unknown

$5.8M

$5.8M not allocated to tracked outside spending; $44K has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

A company giving straight from its treasury, which super PACs may accept. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched

Group	Gave	Won / lost
MAGA Inc. $5.4M not allocated to tracked outside spending	$13M	$19K / $6.4M
Senate Leadership Fund $361K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$1.0M	$24K / $581K
High Plains PAC $33K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$200K	$61K / $83K
Pine Tree Results PAC	$25K	$0 / $16K
Glcf, Inc.	$25K	$4K / $21K
Ohio Flyer PAC	$25K	$0 / $25K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Energy Transfer LP's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Energy Transfer LP's share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
James Talarico	Texas Senate	Attacking	$850K	✗ No
Abdul El-Sayed	Michigan Senate	Attacking	$651K	✗ No
Sherrod Brown	Ohio Senate (special)	Attacking	$601K	✗ No
Jared Moskowitz	Florida 25th District	Attacking	$255K	✗ No
Ken Paxton	Texas Senate	Supporting	$253K	✗ No
Chris Pappas	New Hampshire Senate	Attacking	$246K	✗ No
Kathy Castor	Florida 14th District	Attacking	$242K	✗ No
Roy Cooper	North Carolina Senate	Attacking	$230K	✗ No
Pia Dandiya	Florida 22nd District	Attacking	$186K	✗ No
Jon Husted	Ohio Senate (special)	Supporting	$180K	✗ No
Mike Rogers	Michigan Senate	Supporting	$177K	✗ No
Johnny Garcia	Texas 35th District	Attacking	$163K	✗ No

Company as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Energy Transfer LP spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?: Energy Transfer LP gave $14M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 1% were on the winning side ($108K won, $7.2M lost, with $669K in races still being counted). $44K had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Energy Transfer LP fund in 2026?: MAGA Inc. ($13M), Senate Leadership Fund ($1.0M), High Plains PAC ($200K), Pine Tree Results PAC ($25K), Glcf, Inc. ($25K).
Which candidates did Energy Transfer LP's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?: against James Talarico (Texas Senate, about $850K, lost); against Abdul El-Sayed (Michigan Senate, about $651K, lost); against Sherrod Brown (Ohio Senate (special), about $601K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.