← All donors

Donor

Green Advocacy Project

Company / nonprofit

California

11 reported gifts; 10 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Backed winners

Green Advocacy Project gave $7.3M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 78% were on the winning side ($3.9M won, $1.1M lost, with $924K in races still being counted). $296K had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$7.3M

100% of it helped Democrats

Winning share of scored dollars

78%

$5.0M scored (69% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$1.1M

$924K still being counted

Not allocated or result unknown

$1.3M

$1.1M not allocated to tracked outside spending; $296K has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the checks went

A company, LLC or nonprofit. Where its money came from is not reported. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M check to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.
✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched
GroupGaveHow the group spent itWon / lost
Your Community PAC$2.0M
$1.5M / $0
One for All Committee

$119K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$1.1M
$832K / $0
Nebraska Values PAC$1.0M
$9K / $991K
Planned Parenthood Votes

$506K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$1.0M
$458K / $24K
Somos PAC

$172K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$1.0M
$530K / $64K
Women Vote

$185K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$500K
$22K / $23K
Lcv Victory Fund$300K
$254K / $6K
Cffe PAC$250K
$238K / $0
Working Families Party PAC

$37K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$50K
$10K / $407
Texas Organizing Project PAC

$35K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$50K
$11K / $1K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Green Advocacy Project's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Green Advocacy Project's share of each group's funding.
CandidateRaceSpendingTheir sharePaid off?
Pete RickettsNebraska SenateAttacking$940K✗ No
Josh TurekIowa SenateSupporting$421K✓ Yes
Brad FinstadMinnesota 1st DistrictAttacking$260KCounting
Troy JacksonMaine SenateSupporting$233K✓ Yes
Jennifer BalkcomNorth Carolina 11th DistrictAttacking$230K✓ Yes
Joe MitchellIowa 2nd DistrictAttacking$200K✓ Yes
Dan J. SullivanAlaska SenateAttacking$192KCounting
Max MillerOhio 7th DistrictAttacking$184K✓ Yes
Rob WittmanVirginia 1st DistrictAttacking$168K✓ Yes
Mike RogersMichigan SenateAttacking$153K✓ Yes
Mary PeltolaAlaska SenateSupporting$149KCounting
Don LeonardOhio 15th DistrictSupporting$148K✓ Yes

Company / nonprofit as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Green Advocacy Project spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?
Green Advocacy Project gave $7.3M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 78% were on the winning side ($3.9M won, $1.1M lost, with $924K in races still being counted). $296K had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Green Advocacy Project fund in 2026?
Your Community PAC ($2.0M), One for All Committee ($1.1M), Nebraska Values PAC ($1.0M), Planned Parenthood Votes ($1.0M), Somos PAC ($1.0M).
Which candidates did Green Advocacy Project's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?
against Pete Ricketts (Nebraska Senate, about $940K, lost); for Josh Turek (Iowa Senate, about $421K, won); against Brad Finstad (Minnesota 1st District, about $260K, pending). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.