Which super PACs did Benjamin Navarro fund in 2026?

Great Opportunity PAC, Inc. ($500K), Glcf, Inc. ($500K), NRSC ($44K), Thank You for Your Attention to This Matter PAC ($25K).

Which candidates did Benjamin Navarro's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?

against Abdul El-Sayed (Michigan Senate, about $321K, lost); for Mike Rogers (Michigan Senate, about $129K, lost); against Annie Andrews (South Carolina Senate, about $129K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

Benjamin Navarro

Individual

CEO, Sherman Financial Group · South Carolina

4 reported gifts; 4 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Loser

Benjamin Navarro gave $1.1M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 17% were on the winning side ($144K won, $696K lost, with $12K in races still being counted). $830 had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$1.1M

100% of it helped Republicans

Winning share of scored dollars

17%

$840K scored (79% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$696K

$12K still being counted

Not allocated or result unknown

$217K

$216K not allocated to tracked outside spending; $830 has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the cheques went

A person writing cheques from their own fortune. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M cheque to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched

Group	Gave	Won / lost
Great Opportunity PAC, Inc. $171K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$500K	$59K / $270K
Glcf, Inc.	$500K	$81K / $419K
NRSC $44K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$44K	$0 / $0
Thank You for Your Attention to This Matter PAC $1K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$25K	$5K / $6K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Benjamin Navarro's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Benjamin Navarro's share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
Abdul El-Sayed	Michigan Senate	Attacking	$321K	✗ No
Mike Rogers	Michigan Senate	Supporting	$129K	✗ No
Annie Andrews	South Carolina Senate	Attacking	$129K	✗ No
Mike Rogers	Michigan Senate (primary)	Supporting	$81K	✓ Yes
Jon Husted	Ohio Senate (special)	Supporting	$33K	✗ No
Ashley Moody	Florida Senate (special)	Supporting	$32K	✓ Yes
Roger Marshall	Kansas Senate	Supporting	$31K	✗ No
Ashley Hinson	Iowa Senate	Supporting	$25K	✗ No
Pete Ricketts	Nebraska Senate	Supporting	$17K	✓ Yes
Darline Graham	South Carolina Senate	Supporting	$15K	✗ No
Julia Letlow	Louisiana Senate	Supporting	$10K	✓ Yes
Susan Collins	Maine Senate	Supporting	$6K	✗ No

Individual as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Benjamin Navarro spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?: Benjamin Navarro gave $1.1M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 17% were on the winning side ($144K won, $696K lost, with $12K in races still being counted). $830 had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Benjamin Navarro fund in 2026?: Great Opportunity PAC, Inc. ($500K), Glcf, Inc. ($500K), NRSC ($44K), Thank You for Your Attention to This Matter PAC ($25K).
Which candidates did Benjamin Navarro's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?: against Abdul El-Sayed (Michigan Senate, about $321K, lost); for Mike Rogers (Michigan Senate, about $129K, lost); against Annie Andrews (South Carolina Senate, about $129K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.