Which super PACs did Stephen Pajcic fund in 2026?

New Deal for All, Inc. ($5.6M), Freedom From Politics ($1.2M), New Engagement PAC ($263K).

Which candidates did Stephen Pajcic's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?

against Ashley Moody (Florida Senate (special), about $2.4M, lost); against Roger Marshall (Kansas Senate, about $1.4M, won); against Darline Graham (South Carolina Senate, about $1.3M, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

Stephen Pajcic

Individual

Attorney, Pajcic & Pajcic · Florida

4 reported gifts; 3 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Mixed

Stephen Pajcic gave $7.1M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 43% were on the winning side ($2.7M won, $3.6M lost, with $507K in races still being counted). $0 had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$7.1M

100% of it helped Democrats

Winning share of scored dollars

43%

$6.4M scored (90% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$3.6M

$507K still being counted

Not allocated or result unknown

$182K

$182K not allocated to tracked outside spending; $0 has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the cheques went

A person writing cheques from their own fortune. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M cheque to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched

Group	Gave	Won / lost
New Deal for All, Inc.	$5.6M	$2.7M / $2.4M
Freedom From Politics	$1.2M	$0 / $1.2M
New Engagement PAC $182K not allocated to tracked outside spending	$263K	$80K / $1K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Stephen Pajcic's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Stephen Pajcic's share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
Ashley Moody	Florida Senate (special)	Attacking	$2.4M	✗ No
Roger Marshall	Kansas Senate	Attacking	$1.4M	✓ Yes
Darline Graham	South Carolina Senate	Attacking	$1.3M	✓ Yes
Pete Ricketts	Nebraska Senate	Attacking	$872K	✗ No
Cindy Hyde-Smith	Mississippi Senate	Attacking	$444K	Counting
Mike Rounds	South Dakota Senate	Attacking	$328K	✗ No
Mike Collins	Georgia Senate	Attacking	$72K	✓ Yes
Scott Colom	Mississippi Senate	Supporting	$64K	Counting
Monique DeSpain	Oregon 4th District	Attacking	$7K	✓ Yes
Brad Lander	New York 10th District (primary)	Attacking	$1K	✗ No

Individual as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Stephen Pajcic spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?: Stephen Pajcic gave $7.1M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 43% were on the winning side ($2.7M won, $3.6M lost, with $507K in races still being counted). $0 had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Stephen Pajcic fund in 2026?: New Deal for All, Inc. ($5.6M), Freedom From Politics ($1.2M), New Engagement PAC ($263K).
Which candidates did Stephen Pajcic's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?: against Ashley Moody (Florida Senate (special), about $2.4M, lost); against Roger Marshall (Kansas Senate, about $1.4M, won); against Darline Graham (South Carolina Senate, about $1.3M, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.