← All donors

Donor

Michael Sacks

Individual

Investments, Gcm Grosvenor · Illinois

8 reported gifts; 7 recipient groups listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Winner

Michael Sacks gave $2.7M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 89% were on the winning side ($985K won, $116K lost, with $95K in races still being counted). $636K had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$2.7M

100% of it helped Democrats

Winning share of scored dollars

89%

$1.1M scored (41% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$116K

$95K still being counted

Not allocated or result unknown

$1.5M

$874K not allocated to tracked outside spending; $636K has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the cheques went

A person writing cheques from their own fortune. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M cheque to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.
✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched
GroupGaveHow the group spent itWon / lost
Elect Chicago Women Aka Ecw

$120K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$900K
$317K / $114K
Senate Majority PAC

$700K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$700K
$0 / $0
House Majority PAC

$28K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$500K
$375K / $2K
Affordable Chicago Now!

$7K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$300K
$293K / $0
Chicago Progressive Partnership

$13K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$300K
$0 / $0
DSCC

$3K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$3K
$0 / $0
DCCC

$3K not allocated to tracked outside spending

$3K
$0 / $0

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Michael Sacks's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Michael Sacks's share of each group's funding.
CandidateRaceSpendingTheir sharePaid off?
Laura FineIllinois 9th District (primary)Supporting$349KUnknown
Melissa BeanIllinois 8th District (primary)Supporting$317K✓ Yes
Donna MillerIllinois 2nd District (primary)Supporting$293K✓ Yes
Katherine M. AbughazalehIllinois 9th District (primary)Attacking$174KUnknown
Daniel BissIllinois 9th District (primary)Attacking$114K✗ No
Junaid AhmedIllinois 8th District (primary)Attacking$98KUnknown
Scott SingerFlorida 25th DistrictAttacking$28K✓ Yes
Tom BarrettMichigan 7th DistrictAttacking$23K✓ Yes
Casey AskarFlorida 22nd DistrictAttacking$20K✓ Yes
Laurie BuckhoutNorth Carolina 1st DistrictAttacking$19K✓ Yes
Mike Bouchard Jr.Michigan 10th DistrictAttacking$18K✓ Yes
Eric FloresTexas 34th DistrictAttacking$16K✓ Yes

Individual as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Michael Sacks spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?
Michael Sacks gave $2.7M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 89% were on the winning side ($985K won, $116K lost, with $95K in races still being counted). $636K had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Michael Sacks fund in 2026?
Elect Chicago Women Aka Ecw ($900K), Senate Majority PAC ($700K), House Majority PAC ($500K), Affordable Chicago Now! ($300K), Chicago Progressive Partnership ($300K).
Which candidates did Michael Sacks's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?
for Laura Fine (Illinois 9th District, about $349K, unknown); for Melissa Bean (Illinois 8th District, about $317K, won); for Donna Miller (Illinois 2nd District, about $293K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.