Which super PACs did Responsive Government Action fund in 2026?

Government That Works PAC ($7.0M).

Which candidates did Responsive Government Action's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?

against Darline Graham (South Carolina Senate, about $649K, won); for Annie Andrews (South Carolina Senate, about $402K, won); for Adam Hamilton (Kansas Senate, about $391K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

← All donors

Donor

Responsive Government Action

Company / nonprofit

Illinois

1 reported gift; 1 recipient group listed, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Winner

Responsive Government Action gave $7.0M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 99% were on the winning side ($2.7M won, $25K lost, with $379K in races still being counted). $0 had no matched result and is excluded.

Gave to outside spenders

$7.0M

100% of it helped Democrats

Winning share of scored dollars

99%

$2.8M scored (40% of gifts)

Spent on the losing side

$25K

$379K still being counted

Not allocated or result unknown

$3.9M

$3.9M not allocated to tracked outside spending; $0 has no matched result. Neither is cash on hand.

Where the cheques went

A company, LLC or nonprofit. Where its money came from is not reported. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M cheque to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched

Group	Gave	How the group spent it	Won / lost
Government That Works PAC $3.9M not allocated to tracked outside spending	$7.0M		$2.7M / $25K

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Responsive Government Action's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Responsive Government Action's share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
Darline Graham	South Carolina Senate	Attacking	$649K	✓ Yes
Annie Andrews	South Carolina Senate	Supporting	$402K	✓ Yes
Adam Hamilton	Kansas Senate	Supporting	$391K	✓ Yes
Josh Turek	Iowa Senate	Supporting	$327K	✓ Yes
Scott Colom	Mississippi Senate	Supporting	$301K	Counting
Roger Marshall	Kansas Senate	Attacking	$278K	✓ Yes
Ken Paxton	Texas Senate	Attacking	$187K	✓ Yes
Ashley Hinson	Iowa Senate	Attacking	$187K	✓ Yes
Troy Jackson	Maine Senate	Supporting	$159K	✓ Yes
James Talarico	Texas Senate	Supporting	$97K	✓ Yes
Cindy Hyde-Smith	Mississippi Senate	Attacking	$78K	Counting
Susan Collins	Maine Senate	Attacking	$34K	✓ Yes

Company / nonprofit as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Responsive Government Action spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?: Responsive Government Action gave $7.0M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings with varying coverage dates; the most common larger-campaign cutoff is Oct 14, 2026). Among dollars with a matched election-stage result, 99% were on the winning side ($2.7M won, $25K lost, with $379K in races still being counted). $0 had no matched result and is excluded.
Which super PACs did Responsive Government Action fund in 2026?: Government That Works PAC ($7.0M).
Which candidates did Responsive Government Action's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?: against Darline Graham (South Carolina Senate, about $649K, won); for Annie Andrews (South Carolina Senate, about $402K, won); for Adam Hamilton (Kansas Senate, about $391K, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.