← All donors

Donor

Government That Works PAC

Another PAC

DC

12 gifts to 9 groups, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Winner

Government That Works PAC gave $14M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 95% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026). 98% of the money with a result ended up on the winning side ($11M won, $197K lost, with $1.2M in races still being counted).

Gave to outside spenders

$14M

95% of it helped Democrats

Ended up on the winning side

98%

$11M

Spent on the losing side

$197K

$1.2M still being counted

Not spent yet

$1.2M

Sitting with groups that have not spent

Where the cheques went

Another political committee passing money along. The original donor is one step upstream. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M cheque to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.
✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched
GroupGaveHow the group spent itWon / lost
Votevets$6.9M
$5.2M / $136K
Lone Star Rising PAC$3.8M
$3.8M / $0
Ab PAC$725K
$554K / $59K
Blackpac$500K
$446K / $0
Fight for Nebraska PAC

No outside spending reported yet

$500K
$436K / $0
Wheel Dog PAC$500K
$150K / $3K
The 1861 Initiative$250K
$114K / $0
Your Community PAC$250K
$143K / $0
Cffe PAC$250K
$234K / $0

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Government That Works PAC's money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Government That Works PAC's share of each group's funding.
CandidateRaceSpendingTheir sharePaid off?
Ken PaxtonTexas SenateAttacking$2.7M✓ Yes
Ashley HinsonIowa SenateAttacking$2.0M✓ Yes
Josh TurekIowa SenateSupporting$2.0M✓ Yes
James TalaricoTexas SenateSupporting$821K✓ Yes
Maura SullivanNew Hampshire 1st District (primary)Supporting$463KUnknown
Matthew MaasdamMichigan 7th District (primary)Supporting$427KUnknown
Jasmine CrockettTexas Senate (primary)Attacking$380K✓ Yes
Bill HillAlaska at-large House seat (primary)Supporting$322K✓ Yes
Denise PowellNebraska 2nd DistrictSupporting$292K✓ Yes
Juan CiscomaniArizona 6th DistrictAttacking$253KCounting
Abdul El-SayedMichigan SenateSupporting$215K✓ Yes
Cait ConleyNew York 17th District (primary)Supporting$214K✓ Yes

Another PAC as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Government That Works PAC spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?
Government That Works PAC gave $14M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 95% of it helped Democrats (FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026). 98% of the money with a result ended up on the winning side ($11M won, $197K lost, with $1.2M in races still being counted).
Which super PACs did Government That Works PAC fund in 2026?
Votevets ($6.9M), Lone Star Rising PAC ($3.8M), Ab PAC ($725K), Blackpac ($500K), Fight for Nebraska PAC ($500K).
Which candidates did Government That Works PAC's money end up backing or attacking in 2026?
against Ken Paxton (Texas Senate, about $2.7M, won); against Ashley Hinson (Iowa Senate, about $2.0M, won); for Josh Turek (Iowa Senate, about $2.0M, won). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.