Which super PACs did Securing American Greatness, Inc. fund in 2026?

Maga Inc. ($21M), Accountability Project Inc ($1.0M).

Which candidates did Securing American Greatness, Inc.'s money end up backing or attacking in 2026?

against James Talarico (Texas Senate, about $1.5M, lost); for Julia Letlow (Louisiana Senate, about $1.0M, won); for Ken Paxton (Texas Senate, about $383K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.

2026live 2024 2022 2020

← All donors

Donor

Securing American Greatness, Inc.

Dark money

Florida

3 gifts to 2 groups, as reported to the FEC by the groups that received them.

Loser

Securing American Greatness, Inc. gave $22M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026). 32% of the money with a result ended up on the winning side ($1.0M won, $2.1M lost, with $93K in races still being counted).

Pro-Trump nonprofit. It does not disclose its donors.

Gave to outside spenders

$22M

100% of it helped Republicans

Ended up on the winning side

32%

$1.0M

Spent on the losing side

$2.1M

$93K still being counted

Not spent yet

$19M

Sitting with groups that have not spent

Where the trail ends

What the IRS sees

Securing American Greatness Inc is a 501(c)(4) social welfare group based in Beverly, MA. It files a Form 990 with the IRS every year that shows how much money it moves, but never who gave it. That is the whole point of routing money this way.

IRS filings on ProPublica →

The IRS has the group on file (EIN 991771141) but no return with numbers has been digitised yet. A 2024 filing exists as a scan.

Securing American Greatness, Inc. also bought $446K of Google and YouTube ads under its own name this cycle. All ad buyers →

Where the cheques went

A nonprofit that does not have to say where its own money came from. The trail ends here. Each gift is split the way the group that received it split its spending between winners and losers, so a $10M cheque to a group that spent 80% on losers counts as $8M on the losing side.

✓ Backed the winner or attacked the loser ✗ Backed the loser or attacked the winner Race not called yet Result not matched

Group	Gave	How the group spent it	Won / lost
Maga Inc. No outside spending reported yet	$21M		$5K / $2.1M
Accountability Project Inc	$1.0M		$1.0M / $0

The trail

What the money bought

The candidates Securing American Greatness, Inc.'s money was spent for or against, pro-rated by Securing American Greatness, Inc.'s share of each group's funding.

Candidate	Race	Spending	Their share	Paid off?
James Talarico	Texas Senate	Attacking	$1.5M	✗ No
Julia Letlow	Louisiana Senate	Supporting	$1.0M	✓ Yes
Ken Paxton	Texas Senate	Supporting	$383K	✗ No
Aftyn Behn	Tennessee 7th District	Attacking	$43K	Unknown
Matt Van Epps	Tennessee 7th District	Supporting	$43K	Counting
Darline Graham	South Carolina Senate	Supporting	$42K	✗ No
Abdul El-Sayed	Michigan Senate	Attacking	$18K	✗ No
Sherrod Brown	Ohio Senate (special)	Attacking	$12K	✗ No
Don Davis	North Carolina 1st District	Attacking	$10K	✗ No
Josh Turek	Iowa Senate	Attacking	$10K	✗ No
Shannon Taylor	Virginia 1st District	Attacking	$6K	Counting
Tom Perriello	Virginia 5th District	Attacking	$6K	Counting

Dark money as classified from the FEC entity type and public reporting.

Questions people ask

How much did Securing American Greatness, Inc. spend on the 2026 elections, and did it win?: Securing American Greatness, Inc. gave $22M to super PACs and other outside groups in the 2026 federal elections, and 100% of it helped Republicans (FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026). 32% of the money with a result ended up on the winning side ($1.0M won, $2.1M lost, with $93K in races still being counted).
Which super PACs did Securing American Greatness, Inc. fund in 2026?: Maga Inc. ($21M), Accountability Project Inc ($1.0M).
Which candidates did Securing American Greatness, Inc.'s money end up backing or attacking in 2026?: against James Talarico (Texas Senate, about $1.5M, lost); for Julia Letlow (Louisiana Senate, about $1.0M, won); for Ken Paxton (Texas Senate, about $383K, lost). Amounts are the donor's share of each group's spending.